Referências

AERA, APA, & NCME. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education.

AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for Educational and Pshychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education.

Arthur, W., Hagen, E., & George, F. (2021). The Lazy or Dishonest Respondent: Detection and Prevention. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 8, 105–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055324

Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative Performance of Categorical Diagonally Weighted Least Squares and Robust Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510

Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. Guilford Press.

Bell, S. M., Chalmers, R. P., & Flora, D. B. (2023). The Impact of Measurement Model Misspecification on Coefficient Omega Estimates of Composite Reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231155804

Biemann, T., Koch-Bayram, I. F., Meier-Barthold, M., & Aguinis, H. (2025). Using Markov Chains to Detect Careless Responding in Survey Research. Organ. Res. Methods, 28(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251334778

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. The Guilford Press.

Brown, T. A. (2023). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Application, and Programming. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Chauliac, M., Willems, J., Gijbels, D., & Donche, V. (2023). The prevalence of careless response behaviour and its consequences on data quality in self-report questionnaires on student learning. Front. Educ., 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1197324

Cho, E. (2022). Reliability and Omega Hierarchical in Multidimensional Data: A Comparison of Various Estimators. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000525

Cohen, R. J., Schneider, J. W., & Tobin, R. M. (2022). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Test and Measurement. McGraw Hill LLC.

Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS: Basic to Advanced Techniques. Routledge.

Crede, M., & Harms, P. (2019). Questionable research practices when using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0272

Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006

Davvetas, V., Diamantopoulos, A., Zaefarian, G., & Sichtmann, C. (2020). Ten basic questions about structural equations modeling you should know the answers to – But perhaps you don’t. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.016

DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D., & DeSimone, A. J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. J. Organ. Behav., 36(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962

Dunn, A. M., Heggestad, E. D., Shanock, L. R., & Theilgard, N. (2018). Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparison to Other Indicators and Relationships with Individual Differences. J. Bus. Psychol., 33(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9479-0

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046

Enders, C. (2023). Fitting structural Equation Models with Missing data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Feng, Y., & Hancock, G. R. (2023). Power Analysis within a Structural Equation Modeling Framework. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Flake, J. K., Davidson, I. J., Wong, O., & Pek, J. (2022). Construct validity and the validity of replication studies: A systematic review. American Psychologist, 77(4), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001006

Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393

Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practices and Recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063

Flora, D. B. (2020). Your Coefficient Alpha Is Probably Wrong, but Which Coefficient Omega Is Right? A Tutorial on Using R to Obtain Better Reliability Estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951747

Flora, D. B., & Flake, J. K. (2017). The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research: Decisions for scale development and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 49(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000069

Flora, D. B., LaBrish, C., & Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Old and New Ideas for Data Screening and Assumption Testing for Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(MAR), 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00055

Furr, M. R. (2021). Psychometrics: An Introduction. SAGE Publications.

Gilroy, S. P., & Kaplan, B. A. (2019). Furthering Open Science in Behavior Analysis: An Introduction and Tutorial for Using GitHub in Research. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(3), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00202-5

Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K. (2020). Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies. Leadersh. Q., 31(4), 101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101384

Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135

Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2015). Evaluation of Dimensionality in the Assessment of Internal Consistency Reliability: Coefficient Alpha and Omega Coefficients. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12100

Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0070

Groskurth, K., Bluemke, M., & Lechner, C. M. (2024). Why we need to abandon fixed cutoffs for goodness-of-fit indices: An extensive simulation and possible solutions. Behav. Res. Methods, 56(4), 3891–3914. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02193-3

Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M. G., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.

Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn., 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001

Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press.

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Henseler, J. (2021). Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Analyzing Latent and Emergent Variables. The Guilford Press.

Holgado-Tello, F., Morata-Ramirez, M., & García, M. (2016). Robust Estimation Methods in Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Likert Scales: A Simulation Study. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(2), 80–96.

Hong, M., Steedle, J. T., & Cheng, Y. (2020). Methods of Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparisons and Practical Recommendations. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 80(2), 312–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865316

Hoyle, R. H. (2023). Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press.

Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys. J. Bus. Psychol., 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8

Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. J. Appl. Psychol., 100(3), 828–845. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038510

Huang, J. L., Wang, Z., Huang, R., Wu, D., & Shi, H. (2026). Insufficient Effort Responding in Management Research: A Critical Review and Future Directions. 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251330268

Huang, P.-H. (2017). Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling. Psychometrika, 82(2), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9572-y

Hughes, D. J. (2018). Psychometric Validity: Establishing the Accuracy and Appropriateness of Psychometric Measures. In P. Irwing, T. Booth, & D. J. Hughes (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing: A Multidisciplinary Reference on Survey, Scale and Test Development. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

Jak, S., Jorgensen, T. D., Verdam, M. G. E., Oort, F. J., & Elffers, L. (2021). Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app. Behavior Research Mehods, 53, 1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0/Published

Jobst, L. J., Bader, M., & Moshagen, M. (2023). A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000423

Jones, E. A., Wind, S. A., Tsai, C.-L., & Ge, Y. (2023). Comparing Person-Fit and Traditional Indices Across Careless Response Patterns in Surveys. Appl. Psychol. Meas., 47(5-6), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216231194358

Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2023). Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2021.1940118

Kathawalla, U.-K., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2021). Easing Into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 18684. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684

Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Pratice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Pratice of Structural Equation Modeling (Fifth Edition). The Guilford Press.

Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 09(08), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126

Kyriazos, T., & Poga, M. (2023). Dealing with Multicollinearity in Factor Analysis: The Problem, Detections, and Solutions. Open Journal of Statistics, 13(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2023.133020

Lai, K. (2020). Confidence Interval for RMSEA or CFI Difference Between Nonnested Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1631704

Lai, K. (2021a). Fit Difference Between Nonnested Models Given Categorical Data: Measures and Estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1763802

Lai, K. (2021b). Using Information Criteria Under Missing Data: Full Information Maximum Likelihood Versus Two-Stage Estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1780925

Lei, P.-W., & Shiverdecker, L. K. (2020). Performance of Estimators for Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables with Missing Data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1680292

Leite, W. L., Bandalos, D. L., & Shen, Z. (2023). Simulation Methods in Structural Equation Modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Li, C. H. (2016a). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

Li, C. H. (2016b). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093

Limongi, R., & Rogers, P. (2025a). Open Science in Three Acts: Foundations, Practice, and Implementation - First Act. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 22(1), e250079. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250079

Limongi, R., & Rogers, P. (2025b). Open Science in Three Acts: Foundations, Practice, and Implementation - Second Act. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 22(2), e250116. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250116

Lin, L.-C., & Yao, G. (2022). Validation of the factor structure of the WHOQOL-BREF using meta-analysis of exploratory factor analysis and social network analysis. Psychological Assessment, 34(7), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001122

Mai, R., Niemand, T., & Kraus, S. (2021). A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions about structural equation models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121142

Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K. H. (2017). New Ways to Evaluate Goodness of Fit: A Note on Using Equivalence Testing to Assess Structural Equation Models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24(1), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260

Marsh, H. W., Dowson, M., Pietsch, J., & Walker, R. (2004). Why Multicollinearity Matters: A Reexamination of Relations Between Self-Efficacy, Self-Concept, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.518

Martins, H. C. (2021). Tutorial-Articles: The Importance of Data and Code Sharing. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25(1), e200212. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200212

Maydeu-Olivares, A., Fairchild, A. J., & Hall, A. G. (2017). Goodness of Fit in Item Factor Analysis: Effect of the Number of Response Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1289816

McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, We’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144

McNeish, D. (2023a). Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis with Likert, Ordinal, or Binary Responses. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tp35s

McNeish, D. (2023b). Generalizability of Dynamic Fit Index, Equivalence Testing, and Hu & Bentler Cutoffs for Evaluating Fit in Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(1), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2163477

McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023a). Direct Discrepancy Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Arbitrary Covariance Structure Models [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4r9fq

McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023b). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425

Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol. Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2023). What Lectures and Research in Business Management Need to Know About Open Science. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 63(4), e0000–0033. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020230408x

Moshagen, M., & Bader, M. (2024). semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models. Behav. Res. Methods, 56(4), 2901–2922. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02254-7

Mosqueira Taipe, C. M., Amador Campos, J. A., Krieger, V., Miasso, A. I., Molina, N. P. F. M., & dos Santos, P. L. (2026). Systematic review of the factor structure of WHOQOL-bref in adult population. Quality of Life Research, 35(17), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04115-6

Nalbantoğlu-Yılmaz, F. (2019). Comparison of Different Estimation Methods Used in Confirmatory Factor Analyses in Non-Normal Data: A Monte Carlo Study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.04.010

Niemand, T., & Mai, R. (2018). Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(6), 1148–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0602-9

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv. Health Sci. Educ., 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Nye, C. D. (2022). Reviewer Resources: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 109442812211205. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221120541

Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2023). ’Qualitative’ and ’quantitative’ methods and approaches across subject fields: Implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Jorgensen, T. D., & Corbin, Q. (2022). Simsem: SIMulated Structural Equation Modeling. R package. www.simsem.org

Preacher, K. J., & Yaremych, H. E. (2023). Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Reeves, T. D., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2016). Contemporary test validity in theory and practice: A primer for discipline-based education researchers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183

Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315

Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 26(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.260

Robitzsch, A. (2020). Why Ordinal Variables Can (Almost) Always Be Treated as Continuous Variables: Clarifying Assumptions of Robust Continuous and Ordinal Factor Analysis Estimation Methods. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.589965

Robitzsch, A. (2022). On the Bias in Confirmatory Factor Analysis When Treating Discrete Variables as Ordinal Instead of Continuous. Axioms, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11040162

Rogers, P. (2022). Best Practices for Your Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Factor Tutorial. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022210085.en

Rogers, P. (2024). Best practices for your confirmatory factor analysis: A JASP and lavaan tutorial. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02375-7

Rogers, P., & Limongi, R. (2025). Open Science in Three Acts: Foundations, Practice, and Implementation - Third Act. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 22(3), e250162. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250162

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Rosseel, Y. (2023). The lavaan tutorial. Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University.

Schumacker, R. E., Wind, S. A., & Holmes, L. F. (2021). Resources for Identifying Measurement Instruments for Social Science Research. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 19(4), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1950486

Shek, D. T. L., & Yu, L. (2014). Use of structural equation modeling in human development research. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 13(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0302

Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2020). The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164

Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). Assessing Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434

Sireci, S. G., & Sukin, T. (2013). Test validity. In APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 61–84). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14047-004

Skevington, S. M., & Epton, T. (2018). How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change. BMJ Glob. Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000609

Steedle, J. (2018). Detecting Inattentive Responding on a Psychosocial Measure of College Readiness. ACT.org.

Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769

Ulitzsch, E., Pohl, S., Khorramdel, L., Kroehne, U., & Davier, M. von. (2022). A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data. Psychometrika, 87(2), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7

Urbina, S. (2014). Essentials of Psychological Testing. John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, Y. A. (2023). How to Conduct Power Analysis for Structural Equation Models: A Practical Primer [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4n3uk

Wang, Y. A., & Rhemtulla, M. (2021). Power Analysis for Parameter Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling: A Discussion and Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918253

Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2023). Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 74(Volume 74, 2023), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007

West, S. G., Wu, W., McNeish, D., & Savord, A. (2023). Model Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.

Westland, C. J. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003

Whittaker, T. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2022). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (Fifth Edition). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Widodo, E. (2018). Some Notes on the Contemporary Views of Validity in Psychological and Educational Assessment. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 231, 732–734. https://doi.org/10.3968/8877

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Wolf, M. G., & McNeish, D. (2023). Dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(1), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2163476

Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

Yang, Y., & Liang, X. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis under violations of distributional and structural assumptions. Int. J. Quantitative Research in Education, 1(1), 61–84.

Yang-Wallentin, F., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.489003

Yoshitake, N., Sun, Y., Sugawara, M., Matsumoto, S., Sakai, A., Takaoka, J., & Goto, N. (2015). The psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in japanese couples. Health Psychology Open, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102915598089

Yuan, K. H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing Structural Equation Models by Equivalence Testing With Adjusted Fit Indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(3), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414

Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using Webpower and R. ISDSA Press. https://doi.org/10.35566/power